---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

In the forex two-way trading market, a key phenomenon is worth noting: truly successful forex traders rarely venture into the investment and trading training field. This choice is not accidental, but rather determined by the characteristics of the forex trading industry and the practical difficulties faced by the training sector.

---

From a practical operational perspective, the difficulty for forex traders to engage in trading training is far greater than imagined, even more difficult than personally participating in trading to generate profits. This difference in difficulty fundamentally deters most capable traders.
First, forex trading itself is highly specialized and practical, exhibiting a clear "polarization" in its skill barriers. Traders who truly master trading logic and achieve consistent profits often derive their abilities from long-term market experience and accumulated knowledge; this group has already developed mature trading systems and requires no external training. On the other hand, traders with poor performance who urgently need to improve their skills are mostly in a state of unstable profitability or loss, lacking the financial capacity to pay for high-quality training. As for those in the middle, with mediocre performance, they are often more sensitive to costs and will not easily invest in training unless they clearly see a guaranteed return. This results in a significant mismatch between the target customer group for trading training and their ability to pay.
Second, the scarcity of high-quality forex trading mentors further restricts the development of the training field. Traders with truly mature trading systems and consistent profitability in the market rely heavily on intuitive market judgment, practical experience in risk control, and long-term accumulated trading discipline. These abilities are difficult to break down and teach through standardized courses. Even if they are willing to share some trading ideas, they cannot transform their core competencies into replicable teaching content. Conversely, those who actively engage in training and teach as "mentors" often lack consistent practical experience in the market. Their teaching often remains theoretical or uses outdated trading strategies. For novice traders, this type of training not only fails to help them build an effective trading system but may even mislead them into developing incorrect trading perceptions, ultimately diminishing the training's effectiveness.
More importantly, the effectiveness of forex trading training is highly verifiable, making the "traffic-harvesting" model unsustainable in this field in the long run. Unlike selling anxiety or promoting emotional or consumer products like food, drinks, and entertainment, the core value of trading training needs to be validated by the actual trading performance of trainees. If trainees still cannot achieve stable profits after receiving training, or even suffer greater losses, then the value of the training is directly negated. Negative feedback from trainees will quickly affect subsequent enrollment, preventing the formation of a sustainable customer conversion chain. This strong verifiability means that trading training cannot rely on marketing rhetoric or conceptual packaging to "harvest" trainees in the long term; it can only rely on genuine teaching results. This is precisely what most training practitioners cannot meet, further reducing the willingness of successful traders to enter this field.
Essentially, successful forex traders have already established a profit model centered on market trading. This model does not rely on additional revenue from training businesses, and participating in the training field may also face potential risks—if the content they teach cannot help trainees profit, it will not only damage their market reputation but may also trigger questions and disputes from trainees, thus interfering with their core trading business. Therefore, based on the trading logic of "following the trend," successful traders naturally choose to avoid the highly difficult, risky, and uncertainly rewarding field of trading training. This has ultimately led to the unique situation in the forex market where "those who know how to trade don't teach, and those who teach don't know how to trade."

In the two-way trading of forex investment, successful forex traders are usually very cautious in communicating and interacting with other traders. This is because most forex traders carry strong negative emotions, often stemming from their past losses in trading.

---

In the forex market, the vast majority are losers, a reality that severely damages their self-esteem. When someone's self-esteem is so directly impacted, it's difficult to expect them to maintain a calm mindset. Successful forex traders naturally don't want to engage in excessive communication with them in this situation, as it's not only against human nature but could also bring unnecessary trouble.
In this situation, successful forex traders often avoid answering questions on forums. They know that once they get involved, they are likely to encounter unwarranted accusations or even attacks. These losing traders may see successful traders as targets for their frustrations, venting their negative emotions by attacking them. While this behavior may provide temporary psychological relief for the losing traders, it is an unnecessary burden for successful traders. They may receive a large amount of negative emotions as a result, affecting their mindset and emotional state, and even leading to depression.
In forex trading, it is difficult for both successful and losing traders to maintain a good mood when losing. Successful forex traders are no exception. They may also avoid trading or communicating with others due to emotional fluctuations, fearing that their bad temper will be noticed. This self-protective awareness is one of the important ways they maintain a good mindset.
Furthermore, successful forex traders are usually unwilling to teach beginners who lack basic knowledge from the ground up. Unsuccessful traders often need to find reasons for their failures to comfort themselves. However, such behavior often triggers more negative emotions in public forums and similar spaces. Some losers might groundlessly accuse the market of manipulation, unfair pricing, or even resort to extreme measures like making whistleblowing calls. This creates a hostile atmosphere in forums, and successful traders naturally don't want to waste their time in such an environment. Losers often believe the world should revolve around them; they find it difficult to accept their mistakes and constantly try to find excuses for their failures. This mindset makes them more prone to strong negative emotions when they lose money.
Another situation involves those who make a living by selling courses; their emotions are often more complex. They earn a living by teaching forex investment courses, hoping to earn some income from students, but students might question or even attack their courses. This behavior not only affects their livelihood but also makes them feel offended. Just as in life, when you decide not to buy a product, you can remain silent, but if you turn around and accuse the seller of selling counterfeit goods, this behavior is undoubtedly disrespectful to others. In the forex investment field, such behavior is likely to provoke even stronger resentment, because "cutting off someone's livelihood is like killing their parents." This behavior not only harms the interests of others but also destroys mutual trust and respect.

In the two-way trading field of forex investment, whether forex traders can fully understand the core meaning and operational logic of "betting against the counterparty" is one of the key factors affecting the quality of their trading decisions, capital security, and even long-term trading results.

---

Betting against the counterparty is not a niche phenomenon in the forex market, but a core mechanism closely related to the platform's operating model and the relationship with the counterparty. Only by clearly understanding the nature of betting against the counterparty, the differences between betting against the counterparty on different platforms, and the boundary between compliant and illegal betting against the counterparty, can traders make more rational judgments when choosing platforms and formulating trading strategies, effectively avoid the potential risks caused by the betting against the counterparty mechanism, and thus better conduct forex investment trading.
The term "platform betting," often mentioned in the forex market, specifically refers to the practice of some unregulated forex trading platforms processing investor orders without actually connecting them to the global forex market for matching. Instead, they use their own funds to engage in inverse transactions with investors, creating a direct betting situation. In this trading model, a zero-sum game is formed between investors and the platform—investor profits directly correspond to platform losses, while investor losses become platform profits. This unregulated betting model completely deviates from real market supply and demand. Investor profits no longer depend on objective market fluctuations but on the platform's willingness to relinquish profits. This creates a vulnerability for platforms to later manipulate transactions through improper means, and undermines the fundamental protection of investor funds and the fairness of trading.
In two-way forex trading, forex traders must also confront the realities related to betting in forex trading, with the "market maker" model being a crucial and unavoidable topic. In some forex trading platforms operating under the market maker model, the platform no longer simply acts as an order matching intermediary, but directly as the counterparty to forex traders. This means that each trader's order does not directly enter the real global forex market to be matched with other traders, but rather completes a closed trading loop with the platform itself. This relationship can be understood through a simple analogy: it's like forex traders entering a casino to gamble. The casino, as the entity providing the trading environment and rules, directly becomes the trader's counterparty. If the trader wins, the casino bears the corresponding loss; if the trader loses, the casino profits. It is important to be wary that, under the guise of the market maker model, some unscrupulous platforms, essentially engaging in "betting against" traders, will use their informational advantages (such as access to traders' order data and capital size) and technical means (such as manipulating price delays and creating slippage) to deliberately guide traders to make incorrect decisions during trading, or even directly manipulate market prices to artificially amplify the probability of traders' losses, thereby achieving the platform's own profit goals. This behavior severely undermines the fairness of the forex market and brings huge financial risks to traders.
In the two-way trading of forex investment, fundamentally, there exists a game-theoretic relationship between forex traders and forex brokerage platforms, similar to a "gambler and the house," especially pronounced in the retail forex margin trading sector. The retail forex margin trading industry generally employs a market maker model. One of the core functions of a market maker is to provide liquidity to the market, ensuring that traders can smoothly open and close orders at any time, avoiding situations where trades cannot be executed due to insufficient market liquidity. However, this model also dictates that for every investor participating in the trade, the platform objectively acts as the counterparty. A trader's long positions require the platform to provide corresponding short positions to match, and vice versa. This counterparty relationship is the foundation upon which the market maker model operates, creating a natural game of interest between traders and the platform.
Simply put, in this counterparty relationship, if a forex trader profits from a trade, it means the platform incurs a loss in that trade; conversely, if a forex trader incurs a loss, the platform profits accordingly. However, this zero-sum game isn't absolute. For compliant and legitimate brokers, they typically have sophisticated order hedging channels and don't rely solely on betting against traders for profit. When encountering investors with consistently profitable trades, compliant brokers will hedge their orders in the primary market (such as with liquidity providers, LPs), transferring trading risk to avoid losses from investor profits while still generating stable revenue through spreads and commissions. In certain special cases, compliant brokers may even copy trades of some high-performing investors. For example, when a forex trader places an order for 1 lot of gold on a brokerage platform, the platform might simultaneously place a copy order for 10 lots with a liquidity provider, expanding the trading volume to share in the high-performing trader's profits. Of course, this copy trading behavior has strict prerequisites: on the one hand, forex traders must be seasoned traders with proven track records of consistently high profits in the market; on the other hand, their trading strategies need to be fully recognized by the broker and possess replicability and stable profitability. However, in reality, very few traders can meet both conditions simultaneously, making this copy trading uncommon in the forex market.

In the two-way trading of forex investment, traders' attitudes towards trading indicators often undergo a gradual process from expecting miracles to ultimately giving up. Many traders, when entering the market, harbor the illusion that some magical indicator or method can guarantee them profits without fail.

---

This pursuit of a "perfect indicator" often stems from unfamiliarity with the market and an underestimation of risk. However, as they accumulate trading experience, they gradually realize that the market is far more complex than they imagined, and no single indicator can guarantee 100% success.
During trading, many traders frequently change trading indicators and strategies. Once they find that an indicator is causing losses, they immediately look for the next one; once a strategy fails, they quickly switch to another. This constant trial and error seems positive, but in reality, it consumes a lot of time and money. Traders often unknowingly deplete their capital and eventually have to leave the forex market. This frequent strategy-changing behavior not only reflects the trader's blind optimism about the market but also exposes their immaturity in their trading philosophy.
However, there are also some traders before leaving the market, some traders gradually gain insight. They realize that, apart from moving averages and candlestick charts, most forex trading indicators are not particularly useful in practice. The various complex tools in the indicator window often only increase the complexity of trading without actually improving the success rate. When traders realize this, they have taken an important step from blindly pursuing indicators to understanding the essence of the market. This enlightenment is not achieved overnight, but gradually formed through countless failures and reflections.
Furthermore, some traders realize before leaving the market that even intraday trading does not offer opportunities every day. The market is not always active, and trading opportunities are not always available. If traders are constantly looking for entry opportunities without considering the actual market conditions, they will only fall into a vicious cycle of frequent trading and frequent losses. When traders can realize this, it means they have begun to understand the rhythm of the market, no longer blindly pursuing trading frequency, but focusing more on the quality of trades. This grasp of market rhythm is an important sign of a trader's maturity.
In short, in the two-way trading of forex investment, the changes in traders' attitudes towards indicators and strategies reflect their cognitive process of the market. From initial blind pursuit to eventual rational understanding, this process, though fraught with setbacks, is an essential path for a trader's growth.

In a two-way market like forex margin trading, those who can truly break down price action into cash flow don't bother making a living by teaching.

---

The reason is simple: trading itself is a highly leveraged mental activity; diverting bandwidth to design courses, answer questions, and provide after-sales service immediately dilutes the ROI. Worse still, once the unquantifiable market intuition is turned into standardized courseware, reputational risk increases exponentially. In other words, teaching trading is harder to make money from than trading itself, and the loss is intangible assets.
Furthermore, this field naturally filters people: winners don't need to learn, losers don't have the money to learn, and those in the middle are adept at short-term calculations, with a near-zero willingness to pay. For traders who consistently generate profits, the time cost outweighs any tuition fee; those who cannot profit are simply misleading students by lecturing.
This leads to a stable market dynamic where "those who teach don't know, and those who know don't teach." Training cycles are short, verification is quick, and the market is constantly shifting focus after each round of losses, failing to generate sustainable cash flow. In contrast, teaching people about leisure and entertainment, and selling anxiety, aligns with the underlying logic of "following the trend without making things difficult."
Therefore, traders who truly understand the non-linear nature of exchange rate fluctuations will never enter the quagmire of teacher training, lest their net worth and personal brand both decline.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---